Configuring L2TP over IPSec for both Cisco PIX and Cisco Router on the Customer side.
Tricky things uncovered.
According to the documentation provided on how the L2TP is to be configured:
terminate-from hostname BB-GGSN1
local name CPE-L2TP-Router
l2tp tunnel password 0 secret
ip unnumbered FastEthernet0
peer default ip address pool l2tp-pool01
ppp authentication pap
ip local pool l2tp-pool01 10.9.2.201 10.9.2.220
For the curious souls like me, how the hell the router knows who’s BB-GGSN1.. so I added:
ip host BB-GGSN2 202.x.x.x2
ip host BB-GGSN1 202.x.x.x1
So the router is done but I still wondering, who’s going to auth all PAP request ?
PIX as follows:
access-list 90 permit ip host 203.x.x.x host 202.x.x.x6
nat (inside) 0 access-list 90
sysopt connection permit-ipsec
sysopt connection permit-l2tp
crypto ipsec transform-set transformset-strong esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
crypto ipsec transform-set transformset-strong mode transport
crypto dynamic-map dyna 20 match address 90
crypto dynamic-map dyna 20 set transform-set transformset-strong
crypto map site-map 10 ipsec-isakmp dynamic dyna
crypto map site-map interface outside
isakmp enable outside
isakmp key ******** address 202.x.x.x6 netmask 255.255.255.255
isakmp identity address
isakmp policy 10 authentication pre-share
isakmp policy 10 encryption 3des
isakmp policy 10 hash sha
isakmp policy 10 group 2
isakmp policy 10 lifetime 86400
The tunnel just don’t get up.
I did a debug.
debug crypto ipsec
debug crypto isakmp
The debug shows proxy identities mis-matched, the error code is IKMP_ERR_NO_RETRANS
I poke around with the error and change my access-list address. So I realised I had a typo and it causes the SA negotiation to fail.
access-list 90 permit ip host 203.X.X.X host 202.X.X.X1
access-list 90 permit ip host 203.X.X.X host 202.X.X.X2
This ACL not only tells what traffic needed to be protected by IPSec but somehow it identify the peers on both side of the tunnel’s end point. I have to read up on this as this is kind of new to me. Usually site to site configuration always have both network address for the ACL.
So far, the tunnel seems to be up. I have yet to test the VPN tunnels as the user can’t seems to access the provider’s network at this moment.
Both the show statement shows positive results.
show crypto ipsec sa
show crypto isakmp sa
I’m still curious, I didn’t configured any radius server to auth the PAP users.
This is my first post for documentation.
Cisco Explaination on L2TP